Updated 04/14/2025
General Questions | Project Specific Questions
General Questions
Q: Our senior design is a 2-semester course where the students are formed into groups. Can we propose to run the project with one student team from this existing course or do we have to develop a separate course on the topic?
A: The solicitation does not required that a new course be dedicated to the project or that the course in which the faculty is teaching is only working on the proposed project.
Q: We usually let the students pick the topics they are interested in at the beginning of the course. Do I need to identify all team members prior to submitting the proposal or can they be decided at the beginning of the course?
A: The solicitation does not require that all student team members be identified at the time of the proposal submission. Please keep in mind though that since your course structure allows students to pick their own topics you will need to have a process in place to ensure that the proposed work is being performed predominately by students enrolled in the course.
Q: We were thinking about collaborating with another research group on campus that is generally interested in these kinds of sensors although not necessarily in the specified area. Is this allowable?
A: Absolutely! Leveraging outside expertise is always appreciated.
Q: Can a team be comprised of all Master's students?
A: Yes. Teams can be comprised of undergraduate, graduate students or a combination of both undergraduate and graduate students as long as the team meets the other requirements in the solicitation.
Q: Our design course follows a different schedule of review milestones. May we adapt the project schedule to fit our design course schedule?
A: Yes. The review milestones listed in the solicitation are approximate dates and are set by mutual agreement of the proposing team and the NASA Project Team as long as the overall project period of performance falls within an August to June window.
Q: Can teams from multiple universities work together on one project?
A: Yes.
Q: Per the Solicitation, a project team should be identified in the submitted proposal. May the makeup of the students involved change after the proposal submission and/or the award announcements are made?
A: Yes. For the proposal, individual student names are not required. In regards to the students that are a part of the project team it is sufficient to include a statement such as "students in ____ class that will be offered in the fall and spring semesters will be a part of the project team."
Q: Per the Solicitation, sponsors and affiliations should be identified in the submitted proposal. May additional sponsors and industry partners join after the proposal submission and/or the award announcements are made?
A: Yes, additional sponsors and/or industry partners may be added to the project team after the proposal has been submitted and/or the award announcement date.
Q: Would the sponsor accept a proposal which involved a more hands-on based approach vs an autonomous approach, where the hands-on alternative prospectively offered lower energy demands and/or technical sophistication?
A: Yes. All possible solutions for the defined projects will be considered. Labor intensive solutions may lead to robotic solutions once the solution space is defined for potential future projects. Innovative solutions outside the strict definitions of the solicitation have been funded in prior years of the program.
Q: Will an initial design be provided with drawings, photographs, specifications, and/or performance parameters as a baseline for the student teams?
A: If the proposed effort is selected, there may be some information available from the NASA mentors. However, non-publicly available information requires ITAR release review which may make this information untimely for a student project. NASA is looking for innovative solutions, so refining what has come before is not a preferred approach for a new start. Literature searches have been a valuable part of previous X-Hab projects, however NASA mentors will help where they are able.
Q: Who can provide a signed confirmation for the implementation of X-Hab Challenge? Would the person be the department chair or anyone else?
A: All proposals must be submitted though the proposing institution’s office of sponsored projects.
Q: May adjunct faculty serve as the principal investigator?
A: Yes. The principal investigator may be an adjunct faculty member. The PI must be a U.S. citizen and currently teaching an Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)-accredited engineering senior or graduate design, industrial design, or architecture curriculum teaming course at a university affiliated with the National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program, or other US accredited university.
Q: May as non-US citizen serve as a co-principal investigator?
A: Yes. Non-US citizens may participate in the XHAB program in any appropriate capacity except for principal investigator. Participation by citizens of “controlled countries”, as defined in Part 768.1.d of the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Export Administration Regulations (EAR), is prohibited.
Q: Does the prize have to be a one year long course involving students senior undergrad or grad? Can it be one semester one? Can it be instead an independent study, or research team of faculty and students?
A: The proposal must be led by a faculty member who is an U.S. citizen and is currently teaching in an ABET accredited engineering program. The majority of the students involved in the team must be upper division undergraduates or graduate students enrolled in and receiving credit in the design course taught by the faculty lead. A major feature of this program is that students are in the critical path. The project milestones dictate that the work be carried out over the course of a full academic year.
Q: What are the content and format requirements for the following two appendages within the proposal? - Mandatory – Confirmation of support for the proposal must include signed documents from the university faculty, collaborators, and their potential sponsor(s) to ensure their respective commitment to the project. Mandatory – Include a signed confirmation from the university, stating that the M2M X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge will be implemented during the academic year and will comply with all pedagogical requirements.
A: There are no specific content or format requirements beyond what is outlined in the solicitation.
Q: Can a project last more than one year?
A: The solicitation contains required milestones and deliverables that span one academic year. The Principal Investigator may choose to continue their work after the completion of the contract. Involvement of the NASA provided mentor past the completion of the project is at the discretion of the NASA mentor.
Q: Would the prize fund the salaries of the student/faculty teams or only the materials for built prototypes?
A: It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to develop and propose a budget that will provide adequate resources to conduct the proposed work. These resources may include but not necessarily be limited to direct labor, subcontracts, consultants, equipment, supplies, travel, indirect costs and other items. Part of the review process will be the evaluation of how the proposed budget provides adequate resources for the proposed work as well as the alignment of the budget with the overall objectives of the program.
Q: Can we select a NASA/industry team or are there already defined interested parties?
A: Multi-discipline, multi-departmental, and/or multi-institutional teaming collaborations are highly encouraged. Involvement of NASA and/or industry personnel as mentors to the student team is allowable. For awarded efforts, NASA will provide a technical point of contact that will interact with the group throughout the project.
Q: Is there room for questioning the mission/objectives and therefore research gaps and proposing alternatives? Or a class that may explore mission ideas themselves?
A: This is encouraged and accommodated in the modified systems engineering process built into the X-Hab schedule. The first milestone is a System Definition review that defines the scope and the concepts to be further developed. It often requires tailoring of project expectations and further explanation of mission goals. X-Hab encourages the creative input of academia to complement approaches that may already be in place at NASA.
Q: What might be your stance on proposals that involve aspects of one of the mentioned projects, but do not focus on them?
A: Proposals that directly address the areas listed in the solicitation will be given priority consideration. Proposals that address other areas in direct support of the NASA Advanced Exploration Systems Division will also be considered.
Q: Can the data and results collected from the prototype be published in journals or conferences?
A: Publications are encouraged in X-Hab as part of the outreach strategy.
Project Specific Questions
R&D for Lightweight Space Suit Portable Life Support System (PLSS)
Q: What level of documentation should we assume will be available for this project team? There are multiple ways to approach this problem, but all of them require knowledge of at least the external configuration, mass, mounting features, and utility interfaces for the major components of the PLSS. Will this information be available?
A: We are looking for unique and creative ways to solve current challenges and understand that there will be multiple approaches that be used. In your proposal document your assumptions. If you are selected to pursue this topic, the students, the PI and their technical mentor will work together to develop more specific configurations for consideration.
COOLER – Cryogenic Operations for Off-gassing Losses and Efficient Recovery
Q: May we assume that the phase separation required to release the boil off from the storage tank is out of scope?
A: We know we are asking a lot for very little input resources. We are looking for unique and creative ways to solve current challenges. Effectively document your assumptions. It appears that these are valid assumptions. The mentors may pose these as questions to the students, but we understand there is a limit given the students abilities and available time.
Q: May we assume that the boil off gas is within 5-10 K of the liquid cryogenic?
A: We know we are asking a lot for very little input resources. We are looking for unique and creative ways to solve current challenges. Effectively document your assumptions. It appears that these are valid assumptions. The mentors may pose these as questions to the students, but we understand there is a limit given the students abilities and available time.